DPRG
DPRG List  



to Erick M. Guzowsky DPRG: Radio Controlled Ball

Subject: to Erick M. Guzowsky DPRG: Radio Controlled Ball
From: Erick M. Guzowsky zaphod1 at airmail.net
Date: Thu Feb 5 10:31:04 CST 1998

I thought this was debunked already???  Please help me to understand is
this a real robotics idea or a scheme???  Im really confused now.

Erick




S Sunder wrote:

> Hello Erik
>
> and Hello Jim
>
> I do believe in joks. However, I don't think CORE
> is to be field for joks.
>
> It is serious work of a team.
>
> It is very likely that many may not have an idea
> of what it is but for me it is a great theory.
>
> CORE idea allows one to jok around it so not to
> worry about my comments and they are just for an
> advanced information that CORE processors may be
> the real future for all the hobby, serious research
> and even for the children's toys and games.
>
> I have never seen such a complete idea. Even if the
> idea differes from our brain functions it will work
> in the real world of analog electronics.
>
> I am already in the process to implement many of the
> modifies CORE ideas. CORE is a billion dollar technology
> for sure. I know nothing about the CORE processor but
> just the CORE theory which I found to be that much
> worth.
>
> I am very much greatful for Ron Blue and his team
> members for mailing more than 35 messages on CORE
> theory ideas.
>
> I do not want any one to believe in the CORE ideas
> but if any one of you have your own ability to hunt
> in the capabilities of the brain then CORE can be
> one of the spot to look for the best ideas.
>
> It is very nice of you for having stated the facts
> immediately.
>
> Jim please look at the points embedded in.
>
> With my best regards.
>
> Shyam India
> ===
>       ________  ________  _________   ________
>      /       / /       / /           /
>     /_______/ /       / /_______    /______
>    /  \      /       /         /   /
>   /    \    /_______/ ________/   /_______
>         "mailto:sunder at rocketmail.com"
>    "http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/7432/"
>
> ---"Erick M. Guzowsky" <zaphod1 at airmail.net> wrote:
> >
> > I meant my comment as a Ha Ha joke nothing serious, sorry if yall
> took
> > it as a serious solution to your problem.
> >
> > Erick
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Jim Brown wrote:
> >
> > > > Hi Erick M. Guzowsky
> > > >
> > > > Do have an idea of CORE processor? What does it look like
> > > > and is it available in any form and from where and at what
> > > > cost?
> > > >
> > > > Shyam India
> > > >
> > > > > If you use a CORE processor it will work better!!!!!
> > >
> > > Well, I'm not Erick, but maybe I can answer your question.
> > >
> > > We believe that the core processor is just a hoax.
>
> RE: Hoax is something one does not know about. CORE
>     can not be a processor of the kind most of the people
>     understand by a term "processor".
>
>     CORE is bio-physics concept. If implemented, then only
>     one can call it a processor as it is suppoed to process
>     stimulus.
>
>     CORE can be impleted in electronics ideas in many forms.
>
>     The CORE theory is just great. There is so much in the
>     physics known today that much can be used to implement
>     the CORE concept. It can also be implemented in many
>     other forms and that includes the analog and digital
>     electronics.
>
> > > No one has actually seen one, nor have they seen one work.
> > > So, it has become the things jokes are made of.  Like people
> > > always say, "if it's too good to be true..."  we'll from all
> > > anyone can tell, it's just not true.  Stick with real processors
> > > and with companies that produce real products, that have some
> > > kind of track record, not with con artists that have nothing,
> > > and produce nothing but want all your money.  So the
> > > core pseudo processor seems to be just like a bunch of bologna.
>
> RE: I agree with some of the points here. If you have to
>     implement an industrial robot then CORE may not be a
>     very right concept (I am not talking about the CORE
>     processor) at this stage. Howver, the CORE concept is
>     as good as looking for a man with very great ideas.
>     If properly implemented then the CORE may yield a great
>     human like robo.
>
> > > If you want to find out about the core pseudo processor
> > > you can go to http://www.neutronicstechcorp.com and decide for
> > > yourself and ask them about your so-called investor opportunities.
>
> > > However, don't be surprised if when you send them your money,
> > > that you get a post card from the carribean of how they are
> > > enjoying your money at your expense.
>
> RE: Thanks for your comments. I do trust some people even
>     though I am at disadvantage sometime. I can invest in
>     CORE about a million if they are willing to give a real
>     thing. It will be dream think for students. Even if they
>     can not make it. I will for sure in about an year in
>     my own way.
>
> > > Since I gave you their web address there should be no need
> > > for you to ask about the core pseudo processor again.
>
> RE: I admire you Jim. Keep up with your job. I like you
>     in doing your job best. You are real engineering
>     person.
>
> Shyam India
>
> > >
> > > - - ____ - - - - - ___ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> - -
> > > -
> > >     \/\_\@ ____   /  /\ __  ___          ___ http://www.dprg.org
> (Feb
> > > 21)
> > >     / //\ / / /\ /--/ //\_\/\_/\ /\/\/\ /\_/\ jbrown at cyberramp.net
>
> > > /__/ // // / / //__/ // / /__/ //_/_/ // // /(972)519-2868,
> > > (972)495-3821
> > > \__\/ \/ \/\/\/ \__\/ \/  \__\/ \_\_\/ \/
> > > \/jgbrown at spdmail.spd.dsccc.com
> > > http://www.cyberramp.net/~jbrown
> > > www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Castle/6818
> > > My employer won't claim these opinions so I'm giving them away for
>
> > > free.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

------------------------------

More information about the DPRG mailing list