DPRG List  

DPRG: Re: Question for Experts

Subject: DPRG: Re: Question for Experts
From: Charlie W Youngblood chaz128 at juno.com
Date: Tue Nov 2 18:43:54 CST 1999

On Tue, 2 Nov 1999 16:16:34 -0600  Dan Miner <miner at centtech.com> writes:
>> From: Charlie W Youngblood [mailto:chaz128 at juno.com]
>> Sent: Monday, November 01, 1999 8:42 PM
>> >My belief is that for slow (<10MHz) CPU's with limited memory, 
>> >floating point should not be used.  Instead, fixed point and 
>> >digital differential analyzers (DDA) should be used.  
>> >
>> >The largest counter-argument against my viewpoint is that it takes
>> >lots of hours to write this code vs. simply using an existing 
>> >floating point library in C or similar.
>> >
>> So what about CPU's with lot's of memory? Even slot's to add more 
>> memory?  8- 0
>If you have floating point hardware available, -OR-
>(more memory than you need -AND- more speed (MHz) than
>you need), then by all means, use floating point.
>My current CPU (68HC12) does not have FP HW, may have more
>memory than I need and may or may not have more speed than
>I need.  You never run out of memory or speed until you do!
>				- Dan

What is the fastest CPU available to the hobbie roboticist, not lap top
but in kit form or idividually? 

			Charlie Y.

Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.


More information about the DPRG mailing list