DPRG List  

[DPRG] Re: A modest proposal

Subject: [DPRG] Re: A modest proposal
From: Dan Gates topazx2 at yahoo.com
Date: Fri Nov 1 13:33:00 CST 2002

 I thought your suggestions were par for the course, if we're just out
to please the crowd then I can think of a lot of good ways to do that,
and since adding Vacuum and magnets pretty much discludes the kids
anyway, why not throw in gambling, drinking, and sex. I got the satire
and thought it was a great way to get the point across!  Just as I
would never allow gambling, drinking, and sex at RoboMaxx, I also would
never allow Magnets and vacuums.

--- "David P. Anderson" <dpa at io.isem.smu.edu> wrote:
> Howdy
> Jim Frye writes:
> > 
> > I found your comments rude, vulgar, and wish there was some way I
> could get 
> > back the few moments I spent reading this nonsense. Unfortunately
> they are 
> > gone forever... Pete put a great deal of work into his e-mail. It
> was well 
> > thought out and presented. What you have done is inexcusable. Jim
> Hey now!  
> I put a great deal of thought and work into my email as well.  I like
> Pete
> and I think he does a great job.  I happen to disagree with him on
> this issue.
> The arguments Pete put forth in his posting are based on the axiom
> that the
> design and execution of robot competitions should be driven by what
> makes
> them most entertaining to a lay audience.  
> I believe that is an error.  I have posted many emails to this list
> over the
> years as to why such an assumption drives robot clubs away from
> designs and
> techniques that are valuable to the robot builders; the actual folks
> who
> put their time and energy and money into the clubs.  The ones who, as
> I say,
> might take their joy from nurturing a clever design in the quiet of
> their
> workshops.  
> This time rather than rehash those same observations I chose to
> respond in the
> time-honored tradition of satire: A Modest Proposal.  Remember
> Jonathan Swifts's
> famous modest proposal, to reduce both the over population and hunger
> problems
> in England by eating the children of poor people?  Rude and vulgar.
> Some folks find satire humorous and are able to read between the
> lines the
> larger meaning, in this case that catering to the roar of the crowd
> is not
> the best metric of successful robotic achievement.  Others have
> trouble with
> satire, or even view it as inexcusable.  And some just need a gentle
> nudge. 
> I'm hopeful that you are in the latter category, Jim Frye of Lynx
> Motion.
> Chacun a son gout.
> respectfully,
> dpa
> _______________________________________________
> DPRGlist mailing list
> DPRGlist at dprg.org
> http://nimon.ncc.com/mailman/listinfo/dprglist

Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now

More information about the DPRG mailing list