DPRG List  

[DPRG] "out-of-focus" issues

Subject: [DPRG] "out-of-focus" issues
From: Kipton Moravec kip at kdream.com
Date: Tue Dec 9 12:19:00 CST 2003

I just got back from San Antonio where I was Sunday until today.  Wow!

As I was reading all of the posts I was hoping Roger would not get upset 
about all the discussion. It looks like he is not. Which makes me very 
happy.  Roger is a good guy, and as his post says he is trying to free the 
participants of the organization.

There are advantages and disadvantages to all organizational structures.

While Roger is opposed to dues, and formal meetings, and 501C, that is not 
where the ETRB is or will be for a while.  I have been involved in many 
theater companies.  A lot of them start out like ETRB.  They work fine 
until one of two things happen:

1. The founder quits or burns out.  Then there is no one trained to take 
over. The organization disappears.
2. The organization gets too big for one person.  Then the problem is 
moving from a founders organization. To a more "corporate" type of 
organization. It is a difficult transition and many organizations die 
because of the stress of the reorganization.

Until one of those things happen, the organization works just fine for many 

Next year is the DPRG 20 anniversary. The club has progressed past the 
start-up phase. We already have the "corporate" structure.  The DPRG does 
not live or die because of one member. It is too big for that.

The qualities of the RBNO at the "Club House" are a direct result of the 
organization and size of the DPRG.  Without the available funds from the 
DPRG we would not have gotten the floor built as quickly, we would not have 
had the walls built, no A/C for the computer room (and paying the electric 
bill for it)  We would not have the assortment of practice courses.

There are plusses and minuses to all organizations. Just because ETRB is 
not organized the same way DPRG is does not mean it will not be 
successful.  My guess is that to some extent DPRG started out the same way 
in practice. Just not so formally stated.


At 10:43 PM 12/8/03, you wrote:
>I'm not sure what the confusion and consternation is about the
>experimental organizational structure of ETRB.  I guess if I do
>anything different I should expect flack - the quantity and
>intensity just always suprises me :)
>The structure is based in part on RBNO who's name was inspired by
>'Mother's day out' which my wife particpated in back in those days.
>The main benefit was people could focus on building, learning and
>having fun - sort of a free-for-all that the formalized meetings
>weren't compatible with.  So, those of you who think I'm a meanie
>trying to control the world or something, please reconsider since
>the opposite is the case.  My goal is to free the participants of
>the organization.
>Someone mentioned democracy.  Most organizations in our country are
>not democracies.  Not companies, not schools, not hospitals, not
>churches, not families, not lemonade stands.
>Peace, and happy robot building to all.
>Roger Arrick
>DPRGlist mailing list
>DPRGlist at dprg.org

More information about the DPRG mailing list