DPRG
DPRG List  



[DPRG] Spring Outdoor Contests #1 and #2, addendum2: navigation

Subject: [DPRG] Spring Outdoor Contests #1 and #2, addendum2: navigation
From: David dpa at io.isem.smu.edu
Date: Fri Feb 1 09:33:31 CST 2008

Howdy,

I sat down to write a follow-up to the post on the DPRG outdoor
robot challenges #1 and #2, on the subject of obstacle avoidance
for challenges #3 and #4.

However it became quickly apparent that the way obstacle avoidance
is implemented on my robots requires a navigation behavior first,
in order to explain what's going on.  

So I thought it might be useful at this time to have a code
example of a simple robot target-seeking navigation behavior, using
the math routines previously posted at:

<http://list.dprg.org/archive/2008-January/031332.html>

to illustrate how all this can be used to control a robot.

The previous post as well as those from !!Dean and Kenneth and
Robert and others have been working on the solution to accurate
position sensing: how can the robot know it's location?  

This navigation algorithm addresses the other half of the problem,
how to take the output of the location sensing and use it to
drive the robot to a target coordinate.


1. Coordinates

This code uses the robot's location in 2D Cartesian space at X,Y,
as maintained by the robot's location sensing code, to seek
toward a target location at X_target, Y_target.  

The robot comes out of reset at the X,Y Cartesian coordinate
of 0,0 and with a heading angle, or theta, of 0.  Positive X
is right and positive Y is straight ahead.  (ASCII ART: needs
mono-spaced font to make sense):


                     +Y
                     |
                     |
                     |
                 =========
                 |   |0,0|
      -X ------------+----------------- +X
                 |   |   |
                  \ _|_ /   <--- a robot sitting at origin 0,0.
                     |
                     |
                     |
                     |
                    -Y

Positive rotations are clockwise from the Y axis.

I use a coordinate system in inches, such that a point 10 feet
directly ahead of the robot at origin (0,0) is at location (0,1200),
and a point 5 feet directly to the left is at location (-600,0).


2. Location Sensing

For this behavior we assume a separate task is running, perhaps
interrupt driven or even from a separate processor, that is
constantly updating the robot's location in X,Y, and theta,
as the robot moves.  

// Navigation globals updated by a location sensing task,
// and read by the navigation task(s).

float X,Y, theta;

This sensing task might be odometry or GPS or something Chris and
!!Dean are working on with a Kalman filter, or some sort of network
of radio or ir beacons, cameras, whatever.  

For this behavior we'll just call it "location sensing" and assume
that it works and gives us a constantly updated X,Y and theta.  The
"odometry" code fragment 1a and 1b in the previous post addendum
performs this calculation.

Those data are then used by the locate_target() code to
calculate the distance and angle to the next target waypoint
location at X_target, Y_target, also listed in the previous
post's addendum:

// Coordinates of current waypoint target
float X_target, Y_target;

// Globals maintained by locate_target()
float target_angle, target_distance, last_target_distance;

These values are used in turn as sensor inputs for a simple
closed-loop, or "servoing,"  navigation behavior.


3. The navigation algorithm

The navigation algorithm for steering is pretty simple,
and uses the target_angle calculated by locate_target():

  if target_angle is left of robot's heading, turn left.
  if target_angle is right of robot's heading, turn right.

An improved method might use the angle to the target to
scale the radius of the turn.   But this method works
quite well and is easy to adjust.

The navigation algorithm for speed is almost as simple, and
uses the target_distance calculated by locate_target():

  if target is here then stop,
  else if target is close then slow down,
  else full speed.

Those two functions form the output of the navigate() behavior.
They are read by a subsumption arbitrater and passed along
to the motor control when navigate() is the highest priority
behavior asserting it's flag, at 20 Hz.


4. Arriving at a waypoint.

How does the robot know when it has arrived at a waypoint?

The locate_target() code maintains the variable target_distance
that is the current distance from the robot to the target.  So,

      a. if (target_distance == 0) then we've arrived.

Expecting this value to become zero is not realistic.  We can't
steer the robot that precisely.  So,

      b. if (target_distance < TARGET_ERR)  then we've arrived.

Where the constant TARGET_ERR is a small distance which
represents the radius of a circle around the target waypoint:
the target error circle.  (more ASCII ART: monospaced font)

               - -
             /     \
            |   +   |    <--- waypoint at center of circle
             \     /          with TARGET_ERR radius
               - -


The robot has arrived at the waypoint when it crosses the
perimeter of that circle.  So the larger the circle, the
easier it is to hit, but the further away the robot is from
the actual target waypoint location.

This code uses a two-stage test that includes a measure
of whether the robot is still closing on the target center.  The
robot can know this by saving the last target_distance that it
calculates each time locate_target() calculates a new
target_distance.

      c.  if ((target_distance < TARGET_ERR)
             &&  (target_distance > last_target_distance))
                 then we've arrived.

Once the robot has crossed the perimeter of the circle, it
continues steering toward the center, but as soon as the
target_distance is greater than the last_target_distance,
the robot is heading away from the target center.  That means
either the robot has 1) passed over the target center or,
2) turned away from the target center to avoid an obstacle.  
In either case, the robot can declare it has arrived at the
waypoint.  

We still need the target error circle itself as a limit
because outside that circle the robot may well drive
away from the target when responding to obstacles, while
still on its way to the target.

To summarize: if the robot is within the target error circle
but heading away from the target center, we've arrived.

Using this test for arrival at the waypoint allows the target error
circle to be large while still allowing the robot to acquire the
center of the target if it can.  It also handles the very real
problem of what to do when the robot can't actually reach the target
center, which might well be inside of a wall, tree stump, traffic
cone, or mischievous human.


5.  The navigation behavior in 'C'

// constants that control the navigation behavior
#define TARGET_CIRCLE 36    // error circle, 3 feet
#define NAVIGATION_TURN 12  // turn size, adjust to taste
#define TARGET_CLOSE 96     // slow down within 8 feet of target
#define DEADZONE 5          // steering tolerance near 0

// navigate() target seeking behavior.  Run this from the 20 Hz
// subsumption control loop.

void navigate()            
{
     // target == TRUE when actively seeking a target.
     // Set by waypoint() that assigns the  X_target,Y_target coords,
     // Reset by this behavior when we arrive at a target.
     int extern target;

     // slowdown == TRUE, robot slows down when approaching target
     // Set by the user, read by this behavior.
     int extern slowdown;

     // outputs of locate_target()
     int extern target_distance, last_target_distance;
     int extern target_angle;

     // outputs of this behavior, for subsumption arbitrater
     int navigation_flag, navigation_speed, navigation_turn;

     if (target)

         // calculate target_distance and target_angle
         locate_target();

         // have we arrived at target?
         if ((target_distance < TARGET_CIRCLE)
            && (target_distance > last_target_distance)){
             
             // yes!  signal arrival and disable behavior
             target = 0;
             navigation_flag = FALSE;

         } else {

             // no, still seeking target, signal arbitrater
             navigation_flag = TRUE;
             
             // steer toward target
             if (abs(target_angle) < DEADZONE) {
                     navigation_turn = 0;
             } else {
                 if (target_angle < 0 ) {
                     navigation_turn = -NAVIGATION_TURN;
                 } else {
                     navigation_turn =  NAVIGATION_TURN;
                 }
             }

             // slow down when close to target
             if ((slowdown == TRUE)
                  && (target_distance < TARGET_CLOSE)) {
                      navigation_speed =
                         (target_distance*top_speed)/TARGET_CLOSE;
             } else {
                      navigation_speed = top_speed;
             }
         }
    } else {
         navigation_flag = FALSE;   // no target, turn behavior off
    }
}


Top_speed is a variable set by the user.  NAVIGATION_TURN is a
constant that the builder has to tweak to get smooth turns --- or
sharp turns, whatever is your favorite robot aesthetic.  

DEADZONE is a small range around zero of target_angle, to prevent the
robot from oscillating back and forth and "hunting" the target.  A
better solution for this is to steer the robot with a separate PID
controller, which can then dampen out oscillations around the set
point without giving up precision.  But the dead-band technique works
quite well to accomplish a similar result.


6.  Waypoint Actions

The "target" flag used above is monitored by a separate waypoint()
task to determine when navigate() has successfully acquired its
target location.  When "target" goes to zero,  this behavior can
choose to do several things.

It can fetch a new X_target, Y_target coordinate pair from the
waypoint list, and set "target" back to TRUE.  That starts the
robot on the search for the next waypoint.

It can also perform an action.  It might calibrate its position,
rotate toward the next waypoint, or attempt to acquire and
touch an orange traffic cone.  If it is the SR04 robot and it
is holding an empty soda, it might try to set it down.  This
is a higher priority task than the navigation behavior so it
can subsume that behavior at waypoints when needed.

void waypoint()
{
    // Global target == TRUE if actively seeking a waypoint.
    // Set by this behavior, reset by navigate().
    int extern target;

    // pointer to list of waypoint X,Y coordinates.
    int extern *list_pointer, *list_end;

    // outputs of this behavior, to arbitrater for actions
    int waypoint_flag, waypoint_speed, waypoint_turn;

    // disable the outputs for this task
    waypoint_flag = FALSE;  

    // if navigate() has arrived at waypoint target,
    if (target == FALSE) {     

        // Get next target from waypoint list
        if (list_pointer < list_end) {
            X_target = *list_pointer++;
            Y_target = *list_pointer++;

            // and set target to true
            target = TRUE;
        }

        // Put actions that need to happen at waypoints here.
        if (actions_enabled) {
             waypoint_flag = TRUE;

             // rotate toward next target
             // and/or do calibration
             // and/or seek traffic cone
             // and/or put down soda can
             // and/or etc
             // using waypoint_speed and waypoint_turn

        } else {
            waypoint_flag = FALSE;
        }
}


6.  Subsumption control loop

The navigate() and waypoint() behaviors are two of several that
contend for control of the robot through the mechanism of
subsumption.  A subsumption control loop for these behaviors and
a few others might look like this:

void subsumption()
{
   while (1) {
       cruise();
       navigate();
       waypoint();
       obstacle_avoidance();
       collision_recovery();
       arbitrate();

       tsleep(DELAY);
   }
}

   a. cruise() is a behavior that just tries to ramp the robot
velocity and steering to full speed, straight ahead.  Alternately
it can be set to bring the robot to a stop.  For waypoint
navigation, it brings the robot to a stop, so when the waypoint
list is completed by navigate(), the robot halts.  It is the
lowest priority behavior.

   b. navigate() is our target-seeking behavior, the next to
lowest priority.

   c. waypoint() manages the waypoint list and can subsume
navigate() when the robot arrives at waypoints.

   d. obstacle_avoid() is a behavior that steers the robot away
from obstacles and can subsume everything but collision recovery.
More on this anon...

   e. collision_recovery() is a behavior that handles collisions and
can attempt escapes from being stuck, high-centered, etc.  It is
highest priority in this particular scheme.

   f. arbitrate() does the actual subsumption control switching.
It chooses the highest priority task that is asserting its flag
and passes that behavior's speed and turn arguments to the motor
control subsystem.

   g. tsleep(DELAY) is a delay that causes the control loop to
run at a fixed rate, 20 Hz for my jBot outdoor robot.  This is
actually part of a cooperative multi-tasking scheduler that
suspends the subsumption task while other tasks runs, but that
is not important for this example.  The tsleep(50) function
suspends the task for the remainder of a 50 mil-sec time slice.

This is all implemented with the "continuous message" form of
subsumption.  There's a more detailed description of how these
behaviors work together using the subsumption control method
in the previously cited paper here:

<http://geology.heroy.smu.edu/~dpa-www/robo/subsumption/>


7. Performance

DPRG outdoor robot challenge #1.

For DPRG outdoor challenge #1, the robot has a waypoint list
consisting of two points, the target (0,1200) and the
origin (0,0).  

When the robot begins the exercise it is sitting at the origin
pointed at the first target waypoint.  The navigate() behavior
requests full speed straight ahead and the robot's PID controller
slews the platform velocity from 0 to top_speed, and the
robot drives toward the target waypoint.

What happens when the robot arrives at the waypoint depends on
whether the user has set the "slowdown" flag.

If the slowdown flag is FALSE, the robot will drive straight
through the waypoint, switching to the next waypoint just as
the center of the robot passes over the target. It will then
immediately begin turning around to point back at the
origin, which is the next waypoint, as steered by navigate().

You can tweak the size of that turn with the NAVIGATE_TURN
constant.  You might even scale the turn by the target_angle,
so the robot turns sharper for larger angle errors (although
in my experience that produces jerky maneuvering).

Note that at this point the robot will be some distance left
or right of the target waypoint, depending on which way it
turned around.  So the path back to the origin will not be
the same as the path out, but rather offset from and angled
to that path.  That is, the robot will not try to retrace
it's original path, but rather will choose the shortest route
to the next waypoint.

If slowdown = TRUE  the robot will decelerate as it
arrives at the waypoint and come to a stop, then fetch the
next waypoint from the list, potentially rotate toward the
new target or take some other action(s), and only then begin
driving toward the next waypoint.  If the robot is a
differentially steered platform with zero turning radius,
or an Ackerman-steered platform performing its jack-knife
maneuver, then the robot actually can drive back along the
original path to (0,0).

When the robot arrives at (0,0) the waypoint list is
complete, so waypoint() behavior sets its waypoint_flag
to FALSE, and there is no target for navigate(), so its
flag is also FALSE, and so the subsumption control
falls through to cruise(), which halts the robot.

DPRG outdoor robot challenge #2.

With the navigate() behavior described in this post, a robot
should be able to follow an arbitrary list of waypoints,
steering smoothly from one to the next as each is acquired
in turn.  

If that waypoint list consists of the four corners of a
100 foot square, then that list of waypoints is our
challenge #2, the Borenstein UMBMark.  

As before, with the slowdown flag set to zero, the robot will
drive through each waypoint before curving to face the next,
so it will not be driving a "true" square.  With the slowdown
flag TRUE, the robot will halt at each waypoint and can
perform an action if desired, including rotating or jack-
knifing to face the next waypoint, in order to drive a true
square.  Either technique is ok.  The only metric that matters
for the UMBMark is the distance from the final stopping place
to the origin at (0,0).

With the slowdown flag set to FALSE, the robot won't stop
exactly on the origin for the final measurement.  However,
if the robot is tracking it's own location, it will "know"
that it is not at the origin.  Borenstein's UMBMark requires
that we record both the actual distance from stopping place
to origin and also the robot's calculation of its own
location, so that driving/steering errors as well as location
sensing errors are taken into account.

If you have an onboard LCD or display of some kind you can
display the robot's X,Y and theta there.  Otherwise you might
need to download them to a laptop at the end of each run.

8. Looking forward to challenges #3 and #4: obstacle avoidance.

The navigate() behavior described here will work seamlessly with
obstacle avoidance and other higher priority behaviors that disturb
the robot's path toward its target.


Happy Roboting,
dpa


More information about the DPRG mailing list